Editorial Guidelines – How Fivov Selects Word Alternatives

Our Editorial Process

At Fivov, we use a systematic, evidence-based approach to select and verify word alternatives. This page explains exactly how we curate our content to ensure accuracy, relevance, and practical value.

Selection Criteria for Word Alternatives

We evaluate every word alternative based on these core criteria:

1. Semantic Accuracy: The alternative must convey the same or similar meaning as the original word in the given context
2. Formality Level: We consider whether the alternative maintains or appropriately shifts the tone (formal, professional, casual, etc.)
3. Register and Context: The word must be suitable for the specific context (business, academic, creative writing, etc.)
4. Frequency and Usage: We verify that the alternative is actively used by native speakers in professional and formal contexts
5. Clarity: The alternative should be clear and understandable to the target audience

Our Verification Process

Every word alternative undergoes rigorous verification:

1. Database Research: We consult multiple linguistic databases and corpora (British National Corpus, Google Books Ngram, professional writing collections)
2. Authority Consultation: Each alternative is verified against established style guides and dictionaries
3. Professional Testing: Native speakers across various professions review and validate suggestions
4. Practical Application: We ensure alternatives work in real-world contexts through professional feedback
5. Quality Assurance: Senior editors conduct final review before publication

Sources We Consult

• Oxford English Dictionary
• Merriam-Webster
• Cambridge Dictionary
• Specialized linguistic databases and corpora
• Professional writing guides (AP Stylebook, Chicago Manual of Style, MLA)
• Academic writing resources
• Professional communication standards

What We Don’t Include

We intentionally exclude:

• Slang or colloquial terms without professional context
• Archaic or obsolete words
• Highly technical jargon without explanation
• Offensive, derogatory, or inappropriate language
• Unverified words or neologisms
• Machine-generated suggestions without expert review

Context Specificity

We provide alternatives for multiple contexts:

• Professional/Business Writing
• Academic Papers
• Email Communication
• Formal Presentations
• Creative Writing
• Non-native Speaker Learning

Continuous Improvement

Our editorial guidelines are regularly updated based on:

• Emerging language trends
• Feedback from language professionals
• Changes in usage patterns
• Reader feedback and requests
• Linguistic research updates